• Welcome to H4O! For a reduced ad experience, please login or register with the forum.

Anyone running Fox 2.0 shocks?

GoBlueHummer

Well-Known Member
Messages
95
Location
Michigan
Did a search but didn't find anything. I need to replace my rear shocks and saw the Fox 2.0. How do they compare to the Bilsteins? The OEM's?

Thank
 

RamRod

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,914
Location
AB, Canada
Biggest benifit of the Fox Shox would be the fact that its rebuildable and can be re-valved.

Never ran them personally but have heard alot of great things about them.

Is your rig lifted, leveled, 100% stock?
 

Panzer07

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,548
Location
Ontario, CA
Bilstein 7100 series with reservoir are just as good as the foxes minus the price tag...they are rebuildable revalve for about $125


Torres
 

Panzer07

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,548
Location
Ontario, CA
That's what I'd be running on the rear here soon...I'll report more when I get them and months later of install...so far I haven't read that many and reviews about the 7100's bilstein


Torres
 

4speedfunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,250
Location
Tardville
I'm running Fox 2.0s but, I'm all ganked-up. Not sure any of my specs would translate to a stock suspension. But, they are nice shocks and seem to be holding up very well.
 

GoBlueHummer

Well-Known Member
Messages
95
Location
Michigan
Biggest benifit of the Fox Shox would be the fact that its rebuildable and can be re-valved.

Never ran them personally but have heard alot of great things about them.

Is your rig lifted, leveled, 100% stock?

Torosion leveled.

Also, just to be clear, I'm looking at the Fox 2.0 without reservoir. I didn't know the Bilstein 7100's are rebuildable, that's tempting but still a bit more than the 2.0's at ~$120/per.
I had a 5100 blow prematurely on the front which is why im considering others for the rear. Still running 5100 on the front.
 
Last edited:

poweraidon

Well-Known Member
Messages
830
Location
georgia
Bilstein 7100 series with reservoir are just as good as the foxes minus the price tag...they are rebuildable revalve for about $125


Torres

Where are you finding the 7100s for $125? Everywhere I looked it's close to 200


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Panzer07

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,548
Location
Ontario, CA
Torosion leveled.

Also, just to be clear, I'm looking at the Fox 2.0 without reservoir. I didn't know the Bilstein 7100's are rebuildable, that's tempting but still a bit more than the 2.0's at ~$120/per.
I had a 5100 blow prematurely on the front which is why im considering others for the rear. Still running 5100 on the front.

For all the reviews I read and all the research I made it seems like reservoir-less shocks take scheiße sooner than the reservoir ones.

Where are you finding the 7100s for $125? Everywhere I looked it's close to 200


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Got to know people and the secret handshake.



Torres
 

4speedfunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,250
Location
Tardville
DW...these won't fit the Rancho due to the mounting. They are a universal eye-to-eye shock, 2.0" body with reservoir, 10-inch travel, custom-valved and charged with nitrogen by Downsouth Motorsports (San Diego). They were $1000 for all four. I'm sure you could get a standard pin type mounting (for the front) or a t-bar mounting (for the rear), if you wanted. DSM is a large-volume Fox dealer and they can get anything you need...reservoir or not. They do all the custom valving in house, and they will do free adjustments (you pay shipping), if required. IMO...Reservoir shocks are pointless on a stock IFS H3...there isn't enough travel to warrant the extra volume of a reservoir. A high-perf mono-tube is better choice (and half the price).
attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • fox 2.0 ressies.JPG
    fox 2.0 ressies.JPG
    111.9 KB · Views: 2,358
  • IMG_0682.jpg
    IMG_0682.jpg
    169.3 KB · Views: 2,682
  • IMG_0684.jpg
    IMG_0684.jpg
    273.7 KB · Views: 4,158

poweraidon

Well-Known Member
Messages
830
Location
georgia
DW...these won't fit the Rancho due to the mounting. They are a universal eye-to-eye shock, 2.0" body with reservoir, 10-inch travel, custom-valved and charged with nitrogen by Downsouth Motorsports (San Diego). They were $1000 for all four. I'm sure you could get a standard pin type mounting (for the front) or a t-bar mounting (for the rear), if you wanted. DSM is a large-volume Fox dealer and they can get anything you need...reservoir or not. They do all the custom valving in house, and they will do free adjustments (you pay shipping), if required. IMO...Reservoir shocks are pointless on a stock IFS H3...there isn't enough travel to warrant the extra volume of a reservoir. A high-perf mono-tube is better choice (and half the price).
attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php

What would you recommend for the stock 3?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

4speedfunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,250
Location
Tardville
I recommend you call DSM and ask them. They know way more about shocks than I do. I shopped around quite a bit and they consistently had the best prices.
 

digglesworth

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,789
Location
illinois
thanks cj. as for now, its leaning toward the bilstein 5100s Chris mentions in the "rancho redux" threads. im running the 5100s now and i like em.
 

GoBlueHummer

Well-Known Member
Messages
95
Location
Michigan
Update

Installed the rears today. They mount with the body side up as opposed to the stock and Bilsteins. After about 80 miles I have to say them seem awesome. More than likely Im going to replace the 5100's up front with Fox 2.0's. Seems a waste to buy anything other than rebuildable shocks now.
 

backcountryislife

Well-Known Member
Messages
858
Location
Dumont, CO
Just something else to think about, the fox shocks have very easily sourced parts. If you ever back into a rock, blow a seal, whatever... the fox shocks are easy to fix, and easy to work on. The bilstein's on the other hand were less available.

I just got a set of 2.0's I got for free with a bent shaft, I'm having my shock guy toss some TI shafts in them & bump compression on them a tad... and it's pretty simple to get done.
 

RamRod

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,914
Location
AB, Canada
Just something else to think about, the fox shocks have very easily sourced parts. If you ever back into a rock, blow a seal, whatever... the fox shocks are easy to fix, and easy to work on. The bilstein's on the other hand were less available.

I just got a set of 2.0's I got for free with a bent shaft, I'm having my shock guy toss some TI shafts in them & bump compression on them a tad... and it's pretty simple to get done.

Never thought of that side of the argument... could make or break a long distance wheeling trip!
 

GoBlueHummer

Well-Known Member
Messages
95
Location
Michigan
Fox 2.0

Fronts 0-1" lift 985-02-009
Rear 0 -1" lift 985-24-048

Completely agree with backcountry and really what swayed me to Fox over the Bilstein's
 
Top